Emerald ignition control unit failure
I have a 1992 R100GS with an ignition trigger unit (aftermarket bean can replacement) and matching ICU from Emerald. As I understand this system, the trigger unit has no advance mechanism and the advance function is carried out inside the ICU in firmware. I'm told that these ICU's suffer from a manufacturing fault that results in an intermittent "hesitation". I've confirmed that the current to the coil does indeed drop at the time the hesitation is felt when riding.
Is there an alternative source for a workable ICU? If not, what is a good source for a trigger unit that includes the advance function?
Unfortunately, these aftermarket parts were installed before I got the bike, so I don't have the originals. I do have an aftermarket generic ICU that had no internal advance function.
A topic near and dear to my heart. I am presently awaiting a new module for my ‘78, which is the Ei Alpha “classic” ignition. I bought mine from Rick Jones, and it was excellent while it lasted. It too incorporates the advance function in the ICU, eliminating the centrifugal unit. Just got a note today from Ted Porter saying that he has been seen a video from Ei showing a new module being tested, but he does not have a date for availability.
Mine failed in a similar fashion, with the brief interruptions at speed.....but then it really got silly and could not control the advance at all. A timing light revealed timing marks dancing around in a senseless blur.
I am anxious for a new unit because when it worked, it worked GREAT! For my ‘78, it completely eliminates the timing error between cylinders. I can say that it makes a definite improvement. But for now I’m back on breaker points and my Dyna booster.
I fitted a 1979 RT (pre-electronic bean can) with a unit from Boyer that worked very well. These units do away with the mechanical advance and do that in software. I thought the installation was straight forward and all the needed parts were included. Boyer is an English firm probably better known within the classic British bike circles, but they've been in business since the 80's and make a solid product.
Owning an old Airhead is easy.
Keeping an old Airhead running great is the true test.
It is kind of amazing to me, in 2020, that these aftermarket systems have any vulnerability to fail at all. The whole world runs on this stuff. We have an ‘09 Prius that’s about 5% mechanical and 95% electronic ... and it’s absolutely fine.
I bought a Dyna III back in the late 70’s. Back then, there was an element of risk in buying such space age products. Even it worked for 12 years. Today, these systems should be completely rock solid reliable. There’s really no excuse. Even that 250cc Janus bike I saw in the forum here, with the apparently Chinese engine, has some form of the exact same gizmo in it ... and it will run from now ‘til eternity. C’mon Emerald Island, you can do it!
The Sachse System is available from Bob’s BMW under the “Enduralast” label. They claim it is compatible with stock coils, however. Don’t know. I’d say a big benefit to that system is that the old system can remain in place, just in case. Swap a wire or two and you are back on the original points ignition. Nice.
Found it again. The Enduralast/Sachse system can also be purchased from Euromotoelectrics. Guess I have to look at my options if Ei doesn’t return to the market with a new module. Meanwhile, it’s breaker points and the trusty old Dyna Booster .... and double image timing marks. Oh well, it’s carried me many, many miles over many years in this slightly imperfect state.
Have you come to a decision for your ‘92 GS ?
Thanks to all who responded! Given the weather in Central NY, I'm not feeling a great deal of pressure (yet) to pull the trigger on a new system.
I have an R90/6 motor under the bench. Will that point set up from that unit adapt to the '92?
Stay well all,
I’m no expert, but I believe not. Like my ‘78, that R90 engine has a “nose” on the front of the camshaft that carries the points cam/centrifugal advance unit. When BMW went to the “bean can” concept in ?1980? or so, the nose on the front of the camshaft disappeared. It won’t transplant over as far as I know.
Of course. I'd have realized that if I'd thought it through.
Obviously, David has a "nose" for ignitions. ?
Owning an old Airhead is easy.
Keeping an old Airhead running great is the true test.
Posted by: @4949Found it again. The Enduralast/Sachse system can also be purchased from Euromotoelectrics. Guess I have to look at my options if Ei doesn’t return to the market with a new module. Meanwhile, it’s breaker points and the trusty old Dyna Booster .... and double image timing marks. Oh well, it’s carried me many, many miles over many years in this slightly imperfect state.
The double image timing marks are caused by a "bent" cam nose. The nose of the cam is not concentric. The nose is pressed into the cam, so it isn't really bent, it's cocked in it's bore. It can be straitened with a small (like jewelers) brass hammer using a dial indicator to tell when it is strait. It's a delicate operation requiring tiny taps with the hammer. Break that nose off and you buy and install a new cam. it is easier to do it to a cam on the bench in v-blocks.
simply fitting a Boyer also solves the problem.
any company can have QA problems. it does not mean their design is bad,
my brother just bought a used Prius. the wrench that did the inspection said it isn't really a car, it's an appliance. Bro and the wife call it 'The Dishwasher".
s
- 27 Forums
- 1,867 Topics
- 10.6 K Posts
- 2 Online
- 5,816 Members